Bir Değeri Ödünç Alma
As we saw before, instead of transferring ownership when calling a function, you can let a function borrow the value:
#[derive(Debug)] struct Point(i32, i32); fn add(p1: &Point, p2: &Point) -> Point { Point(p1.0 + p2.0, p1.1 + p2.1) } fn main() { let p1 = Point(3, 4); let p2 = Point(10, 20); let p3 = add(&p1, &p2); println!("{p1:?} + {p2:?} = {p3:?}"); }
- The
add
function borrows two points and returns a new point. - The caller retains ownership of the inputs.
This slide is a review of the material on references from day 1, expanding slightly to include function arguments and return values.
Daha Fazlasını Keşfedin
Notes on stack returns and inlining:
-
Demonstrate that the return from
add
is cheap because the compiler can eliminate the copy operation, by inlining the call to add into main. Change the above code to print stack addresses and run it on the Playground or look at the assembly in Godbolt. In the "DEBUG" optimization level, the addresses should change, while they stay the same when changing to the "RELEASE" setting:#[derive(Debug)] struct Point(i32, i32); fn add(p1: &Point, p2: &Point) -> Point { let p = Point(p1.0 + p2.0, p1.1 + p2.1); println!("&p.0: {:p}", &p.0); p } pub fn main() { let p1 = Point(3, 4); let p2 = Point(10, 20); let p3 = add(&p1, &p2); println!("&p3.0: {:p}", &p3.0); println!("{p1:?} + {p2:?} = {p3:?}"); }
-
The Rust compiler can do automatic inlining, that can be disabled on a function level with
#[inline(never)]
. -
Once disabled, the printed address will change on all optimization levels. Looking at Godbolt or Playground, one can see that in this case, the return of the value depends on the ABI, e.g. on amd64 the two i32 that is making up the point will be returned in 2 registers (eax and edx).